Philips 328E9FJAB Gaming Monitor – Design and Features
It may be $329, but for its size, this monitor definitely falls into the “budget” category—it’s cheaper than most comparably-specced gaming monitors on the market, with only a few caveats here and there.You wouldn’t know it’s a budget monitor by looking at it, though. I has a sleek, nearly-frameless design with a gentle 1800R curvature, which I found rather welcome in a monitor this large. The square stand is easy to attach, and while the monitor definitely wobbled when I bumped my gaming desk, it never felt like it was going to tip over or break.
Unfortunately, the stand doesn’t offer much adjustment, allowing for the typical -5 to 20 degrees of tilt and nothing else—no height adjustment and no swiveling. The lack of height adjustment is particularly brutal with a panel this large, since it sits a little higher than is ergonomically ideal—I felt like I was looking up at the monitor rather than looking at it straight on. But this will vary from person to person and desk to desk.
The I/O on the back is perpendicular to the panel, rather than pointing down—that means you won’t necessarily be able to put it up right against a wall (not that the stand would really let you anyways), but it does make plugging things in much easier than on most other displays. The I/O is rather basic, offering one HDMI port, one DisplayPort, and one D-SUB port for legacy VGA connections, as well as audio in and out jacks. The monitor comes with an HDMI cable as well, and has built-in speakers if you don’t have a separate set of computer speakers—though the quality is about what you’d expect (that is, not great).
The 328E9FJAB uses a VA panel with a resolution of 2,560 x 1,440. That’s only 91 PPI, which isn’t super sharp, but if you’re using it primarily for gaming, it’s not too noticeable. Desktop work is less forgiving, though, and this particular panel has quite a bit of “screen door effect” on solid blocks of white or color. I found this pretty distracting, but again, it’s less visible during games.
The refresh rate is where Philips’ cost-cutting comes in, clocking in at 75Hz—not terrible for the price, but you can find monitors with 144Hz for just a tad more money. Onboard FreeSync means you won’t get screen tearing, though, which is pretty much a necessity in any gaming display these days.
The on-screen display is easy to control through a single joystick button on the bottom of the panel, allowing you to adjust things like Brightness and Contrast or enable features like SmartResponse, which reduces ghosting on moving images. It also has presets for different game types like FPS, Racing, and RTS, though I’ve never been a fan of these as they severely alter the colors. The “LowBlue” mode is particularly terrible, producing a bright yellow tint that is seriously inferior to the Night Mode built into Windows. So you’ll probably leave most of these settings alone, and that’s okay, because the image quality is fine without them.
Philips 328E9FJAB Gaming Monitor – Testing
I ran the 328E9FJAB through a few of Lagom’s test patterns to judge its out-of-the-box performance. Black levels were quite dark for an LCD, thanks to the VA panel, and I didn’t notice any glow around the edges. Each shade of Lagom’s black steps were just barely distinguishable from the next, meaning black details should be clearly present in a dark room. White saturation produced similarly positive results, and I didn’t notice any banding in gradients. Gamma hovered right around 2.2, as it should.
Response time and viewing angles are usually the bigger question marks with these VA displays, but the Philips performed decently in both areas. To test response time, I use Lagom’s pattern that produces an animated GIF rapidly switching pixels between two shades. In an ideal world, this would happen instantly, but on panels with slower response time, the squares within the GIF will flicker, indicating that you’re more likely to see ghosting in games.
The Philips’ out-of-the-box response time is bad, producing noticeable flickering in four of the eight transitions in Lagom’s test—which is not surprising, given that Philips clocks it as 22ms in their user manual. With the SmartResponse turned on, however, the flicker reduced considerably. Philips claims a 5ms response time with this feature on, presumably using the strongest of four settings (“Fast,” “Faster,” and “Fastest”). In Blur Busters’ UFO test, I found that “Faster” was the most ideal setting, since the “Fastest” setting produced some overshoot that would create its own artifacts in games and movies. You may want to try them both to see which you prefer.
The VA panel provides viewing angles that are miles better than most TN displays, but still can’t quite measure up to IPS, so you will see some degradation when sitting off-center. This can be rough on large panels like this one, since the sides are on the edges of your field of view and thus produce some degradation around the edges—but the 328E9FJAB’s curve helps mitigate this. As long as you’re sitting dead center in front of the monitor, you should have an undistorted picture from edge to edge.
Philips 328E9FJAB Gaming Monitor – Gaming
Playing on this curved gaming monitor is very satisfying, as long as you aren’t a stickler about refresh rate. Ghosting abounds with the Philips’ out-of-the-box settings, but once you turn on the aforementioned SmartResponse feature, motion is smooth and clear, and the VA panel provides respectable black levels for gaming in the dark. The 32” size is imposing, and really adds a level of immersion to your games that’s hard to match with other 16:9 displays. Even casual games like Rocket League feel large and in-your-face.
I’d call the 75Hz “fine,” especially given the price of this monitor, but if you’re used to gaming at 144Hz (and you have the graphics horsepower to drive it), you might be a little disappointed. At least FreeSync keeps things tear-free, though you’ll want V-sync (or a frame limiter) turned on in tandem with FreeSync to avoid tearing at 75FPS and above.
The 328E isn’t perfect, but for $329, it’s hard to beat, and I’d argue that they cut corners in all the right places to keep costs down. If you want as large of a monitor as you can get without spending a ton, I’d recommend giving it a shot. Philips’ even more budget-oriented 326E is even cheaper at $279, but the image quality is noticeably lower—if you can spare just a bit of extra cash, there’s no reason to buy the 326E when the 328E provides such an improved experience. Again, you can get almost twice the refresh rate for even more money, but if your budget is tight, the 328E hits a good sweet spot in the low end.
The Philips 328E9 can be found at Amazon for $299.